A boardroom review is an approach that allows a table to assess its performance in a comprehensive way. It assists tables to identify weaknesses in their leadership and culture as well as the facets of longevity. It also assists in ensuring that the table members who pay for table membership are able to perform their duties.
This research area is developing and there remain many challenges. Firstly, the current empirical evidence provides mixed findings on how dissent influences boards and their functioning. Some studies have positive (Zona 2016) curvilinear, non-significant, or mixed results. Other studies find negative (Brown Buchholtz And Butts 2019, Heemskerk Heemskerk and Wats, Minichilli, et al. There are 2012) connections between dissent and the task performance of a board.
Additionally, the existing research is lacking a deeper understanding of the factors that influence the dynamics of dissent. To increase the understanding of this governance phenomenon, it is worthwhile for future research to create a more integrated theoretical approach. This could involve using techniques that use configuration (Federo and Saz-Carranza, 2018; Schiell, Lewellyn & Yan, 2023) in order to aid researchers in understanding how the attributes of boards, processes and contexts relate essential and sufficient causality.
Additionally, some studies employ a narrow definition of dissent and do not report precise measurement methods. Therefore, these studies are more susceptible to measurement errors. It would be beneficial to develop more robust measurement techniques for dissent in future studies.
https://www.boardroombook.com/5-effective-communication-skills-in-meetings/
View all posts by: Tammy Woodruff